ConCourt

WTFH_NEW_LOGO

This was the Fouth application with no response from any.

IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case #: 68/08/2016

In the matter between:-

KATARÍNA KRIŽÁNI                                                                                             APPLICANT

And                                                                                                                             Case #:76/08/2016

ANDRE MARTIN SLADE                                                                                     APPLICANT

And

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA PTY (Ltd)                                                         RESPONDENT

APPLICATION FOR RESCISSION OF JUDGMENT

BE PLEASED TO TAKE NOTICE that the abovementioned Applicant intends making an application on 05 / 01 / 2017, for an order on the following terms:

  1. That this Honourable Court condones the Applicant’s non-compliance with the Uniform Rules of Court and that this application be heard as a matter of urgency;

  2. That judgment of case number 68/08/2016 and Case number 76/08/2016 be rescinded;

  3. That all charges be dropped and Katarina Krizani be released from prison.

  4. That She be awarded a permanent residence permit.

  5. That legislation be amended and adopted to accommodate Hebrew Laws and traditions with Our own Declaration of Rights.

  6. We also seek official media pardon

TAKE NOTICE FURTHER that the founding affidavit of Andre Martin Slade attached hereto will be used in support of this application.

Dated at Mbazwana this the 5th DAY OF January 2017.

Andre Martin Slade

Applicant

Address:

Sodwana Bay Main Road

Emoyeni

Mbazwana

Postal Code: 3974

Email: author@wtfh.org

TO: THE REGISTRAR OF THE ABOVE

HONOURABLE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case #: 68/08/2016

In the matter between:-

KATARÍNA KRIŽÁNI                                                                                                   APPLICANT

And                                                                                                                                    Case #: 76/08/2016

ANDRE MARTIN SLADE                                                                                             APPLICANT

And

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA PTY (Ltd)                                                             RESPONDENT

____________________________________________________________________

FOUNDING AFFIDAVIT

____________________________________________________________________

Be pleased to take judicial cognizance that this Good Faith Public Notice is for all Jurisdictions and that this declaration of rights and all related communication is Executed Outside the Republic for Use Within the Republic in accordance with rule 63 of the HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA rules.

I, Yahshuah, on behalf of the undersigned,

ANDRE MARTIN SLADE

Do hereby state under Oath as follows:

Parties:

1.

My name is Yahshuah. I am acting agent on behalf of the Trust of ANDRE M. SLADE. I am a 54-year-old Hebrew Man who resides at Emoyeni, Sodwana Bay Main Road, Mbazwana, Kwa-Zulu Natal. Post: P. O. Box 1596, Mbazwana, 3974. Cell: 082 444 5841. E-mail: author@wtfh.org

2.

I represent the applicants in this matter and all facts herein contained and stated are within My personal knowledge and are both true and correct unless otherwise indicated. I am competent to depose to this affidavit.

3.

I am a Laser Electronics Specialist by trade (Military). I have been awarded an SABS Design Award for Mechanical Design Excellence. I am also an Internationally Awarded wildlife photographer and the Author of the Book of Revelation 10 by the name of Where to from Here: Cognition. I have no Attorney as, according to Rule 38 of the Constitution of South Africa, I am allowed to defend Myself, My spouse and the Inhabitants of My country.

4.

a) RULE 7. (1.) of the Bill of Rights says that South Africa is democratic. This is not the case at present. According to the Securities and Exchange Commission of The United Nations, South Africa is in fact a corporation (annexure 1). It therefore pays allegiance to corporate laws, not the law of the land which is The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. Corporation law cannot be democratic as democracy does not exist in corporations, and it may only be enforced on its employees.

5.

b) RULE 7. (2.) of the Bill of Rights states that YOU as a corporation/government must respect and up-hold the rights of the people. We were the owners of Sodwana Bay Guest House in northern Kwa-Zulu Natal. Katarina Krizani is My partner, Bride and witness. We engaged by Hebrew tradition on 31/03/2014 as is Our constitutional right and YOU have to respect that. It is clear that YOUR system does not respect the Constitution of South Africa as I will demonstrate to YOU with what follows, starting from 22 June 2016 to present.

6.

RULE 8. of the Bill of Rights concerns My Bride and I as We have stated to UZA in a Bill of Plaint (annexure 2). We are from Hebrew origin, practice Hebrew tradition and obey Hebrew Law. Our wedding license is the honour between God, Myself and My Partner. Obtaining a license from a corporation divides Us from God and Our honour. Therefore, We cannot create paperwork that binds Us to an institution or corporation as We are bound by Our Honour to God only. Corporation has no say over Us as We are loyal to God’s Law. We are the Juristic people mentioned here and The God of Israel is Our Judge and Juror. As YOU are a corporation, YOUR laws and Our laws are not the same so Rule 8. 3. a. has to become relevant as state and president have sworn loyalty to Biblical Law (annexure 3). It is the intent of Rule 8, to protect people like Katarina and I. YOU are not honouring or respecting this, which is perjury.

7.

RULE 9. 1. of the Bill of Rights is supreme law and the highest legal power. It states that YOU have NO superior right over Me. We are both entitled to the rights within this Bill of Rights of South Africa and the United Nations Human Rights Code. In other words, YOU are not at liberty to incarcerate My Bride on the grounds of YOUR rules. The words “harbouring and illegal” appear no where within the Bill of Rights of SA or the UNHRC. They are therefore not applicable to Us. YOU are persecuting Us with Your laws, thus violating Our rights of the Bill of Rights of South Africa and the UNHRC.

8.

RULE 10 of the Bill of Rights states that YOU have to respect and protect Our dignity. As Hebrews, We are most civilised of all. Our Tribe is one of the original 12 tribes of Israel known as The Tribe of Judah. We respect and expect to be respected in return; Annexure 4 is Our proof of that. My Bride has been detained in a holding cell/prison in Northern KZN for four months now. She has shared a cell with many others. At times She has to stay outside for lack of space, sometimes for up to 3 days there is no water. She has even been assaulted by an inmate who practices shembe rituals and is unbearably loud till late, She has to wear ear plugs. There is mold/algae growing down very old leaks from the taps and the lights are on all night when they work. Inmates steal from Her and don’t flush the toilet. How are these conditions complementary to human dignity I ask You? YOUR standards of human dignity are obviously much inferior to Ours.

9.

RULE 12. 1. of the Bill of Rights states that everyone has the right to freedom and security. The word “Docit” as in docking a ship in a harbour refers to a subject booked into the shipping system; in this instance it is a subject of private corporation. The word does not appear in the BOR. As We are not subjects of corporation jurisdiction, We are not subject to its laws. Therefore the “Docit” raised for Katarina Krizani has no validity. YOU have taken Her freedom from Her without a trial. She did not need to be offered bail as it does not apply, thus She is not bonded to YOU. Innocent until proven guilty applies to Everyone (UN Human Rights Article 11. 1.)!

RULE 12. 2. of the Bill of Rights, the right to psychological integrity, is there to protect Us from being judged by ignorance. If YOUR judge has never met a Genius of Logics ever before, how is he able to judge Her sanity? His cognitive dissonance towards contrasting information is blatantly obvious. Logic is the gift of correct reasoning. Sending Her for psychiatric evaluation is a protocol procedure within corporation law. “Doctors” in the system all “practice” meaning that they are doing experiments and are not 100% sure of anything. They are not at liberty to judge My Bride’s or My sanity. We do not support the medical industry as God is Our Doctor and He decides Our fate. She also has not signed any consent meaning that YOU are in violation of this rule.

10.

a) RULE 14 of the Bill of Rights states that We have right to privacy. Our beliefs are very private to Us. YOUR reaction to Our statement of whom We do not accommodate has brought about a branding of being “racists” by the media. Our intent was very far from that. Since then, We have been deprived of Our privacy and humiliated by the media.

b) RULE 14. (d.) of the Bill of Rights allows Us to communicate in privacy. As it is not possible at Emanguzi “prison”, We write letters to each other. She handed Me a private letter on Our visit; a Warrant Officer from the Police took the letter and read it. That is another violation of Our rights.

11.

RULE 15. (1.) of the Bill of Rights says that We are allowed to believe what WE want. We believe that God put Us together for the purpose of being His two witnesses (Revelation 11, Deuter 19: 15) and Her being My Bride (Revelation 19: 9). We have proven and thus believe that I am the Anointed One/Christ, The Prince of Peace, and that She is My Queen (Mattew 12: 42, Luke 11: 31). We believe that My name is YAHSHUAH and Hers IMMAYAH and that We are The Sanctified Couple that completes Holy Trinity with YAHWEH God as in Father, Son and Holy Spirit, where IMMAYAH is the latter. We have published a book to validate Our claim/belief. It is up to humanity to either accept or reject. It is Our right to believe fully in what We have written by God’s command and We do so without prejudice as We know it to be ABSOLUTE TRUTH. Our conscience which this rule gives Us right to, makes Us speak only The TRUTH as The Bible dictates to worship God in TRUTH.

12.

RULE 15. (3.) (a.) of the Bill of Rights says that State law has to allow for and accommodate Our traditional marriage. We are following Biblical traditional law and Your system is connected directly to The Bible and God. That is why YOU use the phrase “So Help Me God” in YOUR courts because church and state are married. If Our family law is already part of YOUR laws, surely YOU have to allow for them. If YOU do not, once again it is perjury; not only from state but also from Church. In this instance the Roman Catholic Church as it is their legal system governed by the Pope; this is confirmed by the Apostolic letter issued Moto Proprio of 11/7/2013 (annexure 5). The Pope claims to be instead of The Son of God so his legal system must promote the Word of God, The Bible, which is founded on The Son of God.

13.

RULE 18 of the Bill of Rights grants Us the right of association. As the owners of Sodwana Bay Guest House, a sole proprietary not registered with tourism, We were free to choose with whom We associate. We stated that We no longer accommodate Blacks or Government agents. As Hebrews We have certain rules We adhere to with regard to what level and kind of association We have with other kinds. Myself and Katarina have Pure Spirits; We cannot be “racist”. The word “racist” is described in Black’s Law dictionary as follows: “ RACISM? A set of policies that is exhibited by a person or persons toward a group of people of a different race. Often antagonistic and confronting. The assumption of lower intelligence and importance given to a person because of their racial characteristics”. It is described in Dictionary.com in its etymology as: “1932 as a noun, 1938 as an adjective, from race (n.2); racism is first attested 1936 (from French racisme, 1935), originally in the context of Nazi theories”. Feudalism, the present world control system, is a Nazi concept started in 1776. It goes in contrast with biblical teaching. Racism was invented to create “moral” dilemma and does not exist. Our morals are based on God’s instruction and We believe that We have been given more talents than others. One must be blind not to see that. It is Our right to choose to associate with creatures of equal spiritual elevation. We believe and The Bible confirms that We are servants of YAHWEH and Blacks are servant to Man. Annexure 4 will prove that We do not discriminate, We are rather symbiotic as We follow the law of God’s hierarchy. Besides, God is Creator of all which means He also made the Black kind. As Elohim We can only love what God created. The Heavenly Kingdom has strict hierarchy rules We follow. The 1776 USA founding declaration of Independence also excludes Blacks from human rights. That’s why they originally had slavery. We are horses and naturally choose not to run with the zebra; it does not mean We don’t like them.

14.

RULE 31 of the Bill of Rights speaks of the right to enjoy one’s culture. It is Our culture to live pure lives. We do not consume GMO, chemical preservatives, beef, pork or lamb/goat. We wear pure garments of non GMO cotton or hemp. We do not handshake nor do We eat anything that God did not make that We are aware of. We are pure bred Hebrews with Family root history starting from Adam. We have withdrawn from YOUR system to follow Our root system as that is originally Our culture. YOU are therefore denying Us of Our constitutional right to practice Our culture (UNHR Art 1,6,7,8). If there is any “racism” here, it is on YOUR side only.

15.

RULE 33 of the Bill of Rights says that everyone has a right to be treated within their law. If Our law is common law/God’ Law and YOU are not giving Us the benefit of this law, then it is not fair or procedural. (2) We therefore demand written reasons for these violations against Our rights (3) and that National legislation be enacted to give effect to these rights.

16.

a) RULE 35. 2. (d.) of the Bill of Rights. Everyone has the right to challenge the lawfulness of their detention and if unlawful be be released. The detention of My Bride is based on a decision of someone who has never been in the company of superior intellect such as Hers. She is an EU certified Genius of Logics with an IQ of 144. She was internationally ranked number 33 in Her year of evaluation (annexure 6). The decision to send Her for psychiatric evaluation does not automatically constitute detention (annexure 7). In court She has not been given an opportunity to state Her side of the case. I am also not allowed to represent Her contrary to Rule 38. b of the BOR. If We are not allowed to state Our facts to court, then how are We to defend Our rights. If court is ignorant to common law and the legal system it employs, then it is also ignorant to the BOR. Ignorance to the BOR is a violation towards the democracy of every South African and therefore makes Her detention unlawful so She has to be released. Her detention is also in contravention of section 34 of the Immigration act as She may not be detained for longer than 30 days or 48 hours for another reason other than deportation.

17.

b) RULE 35. 2. (e.) of the Bill of Rights states that detention conditions have to be consistent with human dignity, including among others adequate nutrition and reading material. On the day of Her arrest (annexure 8), We told the arresting officer that We have special dietary needs as We are Hebrew. To date My Bride has not eaten one single meal that has been on offer as it does not fall within Our dietary specifications. I am forced to take food to Her 3 times a week, a drive of 200km for Me. These days I have no choice but hike as Our business is closed down and there has been no income other than small donations. The neighbors even help Us with food. She was denied the request for Bibles for inmates. I found a donor for Bibles and managed to get 5 Zulu and 4 English.

18.

RULE 38 of the Bill of Rights gives Us the right to approach any competent court if a right has been infringed or threatened. Katarina and I went to DHA to apply for an extended visa or residency permit for Her to stay in South Africa. Our engagement is 3 years before We are allowed to be married. We were unable to obtain any form of permit. We declared Our engagement to the community We live in and We published it in Our book. We were incapable of any response other than getting into court and getting court to take note of Our complaint. We therefore seek appropriate relief from the legal system. That legislation be amended and adopted to accommodate Hebrew Laws and traditions with Our own Declaration of Rights. YOUR requirement to having documentation in Her “passport” is not Our problem, so it has to be taken care of. We also seek official media pardon and that all charges against Us be dropped and Katarina be given Her freedom back.

19.

RULE 39 of the Bill of Rights is a command to courts to promote the values of an open and democratic society. As the Maritime legal system is private corporation law, democracy does not exist within it. It is therefore imperative that courts take this and international law into account when addressing juristic public who are not part of that corporation. YOU are therefore compelled to accommodate every common law situation that may arise. This is not the case with Our engagement/marriage. This Bill also does not deny the existence of Our tradition and Family Law as it is based on Human Dignity and Biblical values and state has to be loyal to that as they are one.

(Signed) Andre M. Slade

DEPONENT

I certify that the deponent has acknowledged that He understands the contents of this affidavit which was sworn to before me at Mbazwana on this the 5th day of January 2017. That the same are true and correct to the best of His knowledge. That He has no objection to taking this oath which He also considers binding on His conscience and uttering the words “So help me God”

(Signed)_________________________________

COMMISSIONER OF OATHS

Full names:________________________________

Capacity:________________________________

Address:______________________________________

 

The Thrird application

IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

CASE NO: _________ /2016

In the matter between:

ANDRE MARTIN SLADE

and

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA PTY (Ltd)

Including and or “All” Agents, Administrative Judges, All” Assigns, “All” Chief Clerks, “All” Clerks, “All” Officers, “All” Registrars, “All” Masters, “All” Sheriffs and “All” acting Agents of the REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA PTY (Ltd);

NOTICE OF MOTION

TAKE NOTICE that the applicant hereby makes application to this Court for an order in the following terms:

  1. Directing that the forms and rules of this Court are dispensed with and this matter is dealt with as a matter of urgency.
  2. Granting the applicant direct access to this Court.
  3. For the release of My wife from detention and She be granted a residence permit and full pardon.
  4. That Mr Jacob Zuma step down as president of South Africa.

  5. That the Cabinet of the South African government be disolved.

TAKE NOTICE FURTHER that the accompanying affidavit of ANDRE MARTIN SLADE and annexures thereto will be used in support hereof.

TAKE NOTICE FURTHER that in view of the urgency of this matter, if any respondent intends opposing this application, it must by Teusday 22 November 2016, notify the applicants’ attorneys and the Registrar in writing of its notice of intention to oppose, in accordance with Rule 18(3).

Signed at Mbazwana on 9 November 2016

E-mail and Registered post
To:

The Registrar of the Constitutional Court

Braamfontein

generaloffice@concourt.org.za.

mathiba@concourt.org.za

visagie@concourt.org.za

E-mailed and Registered Post

The African National Congress

PO Box 61884

Marshalltown

2107

54 Pixley Seme Street, Johannesburg, 2001

Fax:011 376 1242/086 508 2441

 

 

And by email

communications@anc.org.za

E-mailed to the following:

Premier: Mr David Makhura
Mail: Private Bag X61, Marshalltown, 2107
Street: Office of the Premier, East wing, 13th Floor,

30 Simmonds Street, Marshalltown, Johannesburg.

And to:

By email

Deborah.Tshivhasa@gauteng.gov.za

Charlotte.Dube@gauteng.gov.za

Phumla.sekhonyana@gauteng.gov.za

Minette.smit@gauteng.gov.za

Thabo.masebe@gauteng.gov.za

MEC: Mr Lebogang Maile
PO Box 8769, Johannesburg, 2000
Diamond Corner Building, 11th Floor, Eloff and Market Streets, Marshalltown, Johannesburg.

And to:

By email

Thandeka.Mbassasegabi@gauteng.gov.za

roleta.lebelo@gauteng.gov.za

Percy.mthimkhulu@gauteng.gov.za

MEC: Ms Sizakele Nkosi-Malobane
Mail: PO Box 62440, Marshalltown, 2107
Street: Standard Bank Building, 27th Floor, 78 Fox Street,

Marshalltown, Johannesburg

And to:

By e-mail

Thabi.Ntuli@gauteng.gov.za

Dumisani.Ngema@gauteng.gov.za

Thapelo.Moiloa@gauteng.gov.za

MEC: Mr Lebogang Maile
Mail: Private Bag X091, Marshalltown, 2107
Street: 7th Floor, 94 cnr Main and Harrison Streets, Marshalltown, Johannesburg
And to:

By e-mail

Thokozile.Makgato@gauteng.gov.za
Phindile.Kunene@gauteng.gov.za

MEC: Mr Panyaza Lesufi
Mail: PO Box 7710, Johannesburg, 2000
Street: Arcadia Building, 10th Floor, 111 Commissioner Street, Johannesburg

And to:


By e-mail

Agnes.Vumazonke@gauteng.gov.za

Oupa.Bodibe@gauteng.gov.za

Edward.Mosuwe@gauteng.gov.za

Nanagolo.Leopeng@gauteng.gov.za

MEC: Ms Barbara Creecy

Mail: Private Bag X12, Marshalltown, 2107

Street: Imbumba house, 75 Fox Street, Marshalltown, Johannesburg

And to:

By e-mail

Mamokwe.Makoloka@gauteng.gov.za

agnes.vumazonke@gauteng.gov.za

John.Sukazi@gauteng.gov.za

Boitumelo.Matshediso@gauteng.gov.za

MEC: Ms Qedani Mahlangu
Mail: Private Bag X085, Marshalltown, 2107
Street: Bank of Lisbon Building, 22nd Floor, 37 Sauer Street, Johannesburg

And to:

By e-mail

Khanyisa.Nkuna@gauteng.gov.za

Phumeza.langa@gauteng.gov.za

Prince.Hamnca@gauteng.gov.za

steve.mabona@gauteng.gov.za

MEC: Mr Jacob Mamabolo
Mail: Private Bag X83, Marshalltown, 2107
Street: Impophoma House, 6th Floor, 18 Rissik Street, Johannesburg

And to:


By e-mail

Phindile.Mafukate@gauteng.gov.za

tumelo.maimane@gauteng.gov.za

Stone.Liphoko@gauteng.gov.za

MEC: Mr Paul Mashatile
Mail: Private Bag X86, Marshalltown, 2107
Street: Corner House, 17th Floor, cnr Commissioner and Sauer Streets, Johannesburg

And to:

MEC: Mr Ismail Vadi
Mail: Private Bag X88, Marshalltown, 2107
Street: Sage Life Building, North Tower, 13th Floor, 41 Simmonds Street, Johannesburg

And to:

MEC: Nonhlanhla Faith Mazibuko
Mail: Private Bag X33, Johannesburg, 2000
Street: NBS Building, 7th Floor, 38 cnr Rissik and Market Streets, Johannesburg

By e-mail

Ephenia.Lerutle@gauteng.gov.za

Ntlakanipho.Nkontwana@gauteng.gov.za

victor.moreriane@gauteng.gov.za

motsamai.motlhaolwa@gauteng.gov.za

By e-mail


Sofia.Yusuf@gauteng.gov.za

Ronald.Swartz@gauteng.gov.za

Octavia.Mamabolo@gauteng.gov.za

By e-mail

Namhla.Siqaza@gauteng.gov.za

Mashudu.Magada@gauteng.gov.za

Nomazwe.Ntlokwana@gauteng.gov.za

The list is long so here is a link to see who else received it

 

IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

In the matter between:-

ANDRE MARTIN SLADE                                                                                                APPLICANT

And

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA PTY (Ltd)                                                             RESPONDENT

____________________________________________________________________

FOUNDING AFFIDAVIT

____________________________________________________________________

Be pleased to take judicial cognizance that this Good Faith Public Notice is for all Jurisdictions and that this declaration of rights and all related communication is Executed Outside the Republic for Use Within the Republic in accordance with rule 63 of the HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA rules.

I, Yahshuah, on behalf of the undersigned,

ANDRE MARTIN SLADE

Do hereby state under Oath as follows:

Parties:

1.

My name is Yahshuah. I am acting agent on behalf of the Trust of ANDRE MARTIN SLADE. I am a 54 year old Hebrew Man who resides at Emoyeni, Sodwana Bay Main Road, Mbazwana, Kwa-Zulu Natal. Post: P. O. Box 1596, Mbazwana, 3974. Cell: 082 444 5841. E-mail: author@wtfh.org.

2.

I represent the applicant in this matter and all facts herein contained and stated are within My personal knowledge and are both true and correct unless otherwise indicated. I am competent to depose to this affidavit.

3.

I am a Laser Electronics Specialist by trade (Military). I have been awarded an SABS Design Award for Mechanical Design Exellence. I am also an Internationally Awarded Wildlife Photographer and the Author of the Book of Revelation 10 by the name of Where to from Here: Cognition. I have no Attorney as, according to Rule 38 of the Constitution of South Africa, I am allowed to defend Myself, My spouse and the Inhabitants of this country.

4.

According to Rule 38. (a.)(b.)(d.) of the Constitution I am exercising the right to challenge the legal system of South Africa on the following grounds:

  1. That the Republic of South Africa is not democratic.

  2. That the governing body is illegal.

  3. That the Legal system is perjurious.

  4. That the Constitution is not honored by government or the legal system.

  5. That Our environment is not safe.

  6. That the government is purposefully withholding information vital to the inhabitants.

5.

Sapa: On 1 September 2014, the President of South Africa, Jacob Zuma, made the following statements at an ambassadors and commissioners meeting in Pretoria:

  • I know they say Jesus will return to fetch us. But I don’t know how many will stay behind. Maybe the majority”.

  • But this time not to fetch us, but just to come and cleanse us of our sins, because we have caused more damage than before”.

  • He must just come for a few years to help us so that we are ready for when he finally comes”.

What damage was Mr Zuma referring to?

6.

The etymology of the following words in The Constitution of South Africa of 1996, renders it invalid. I quote from Dictionary.com and Black’s Law Dictionary.

  1. Democracy (Rule 7. 1.): (Etymology: government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system). The etymology of key words in the legal system employed by the “South African Government” connects its set of Laws to the Holy See (Jesuit, Vatican, Roman Catholic Church). They are rules/laws of corporation conduct, based on shipping trade, known as Admiralty or Maritime Law. In order for South Africa to be registered with the UN Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) as a corporation (CIK # 0000932419), its governing body also had to be a corporation management body. That made Jacob Zuma the CEO of the Corporation of South Africa. As a CEO, he represents his company on the international trade platform. These rules/laws are only legal on the ocean and cannot be applied on Land. It is therefore impossible to associate them with any form of democracy whatsoever! Democracy originally meant “Demographically ruled by Wisdom (cracy: wisdom/power/knowledge) with the people”; only God is Wisdom and Power and He gave us His set of rules. South Africa is an employer, not a government; no corporation is democratic.

  2. Human/Person/Man/People refers to Homo sapient (etymology: wise), the ones described in the Bible as being made in the image of God. Amongst other requirements, to qualify as a Homo sapient, your brain has to weigh about 1.4kg. A standard set by a specific feature. When Jan van Riebeeck set foot in Africa, that was already his classification. However; the tribes they met here were never classified and slotted directly into the the Homo sapiens category; it was never protested or disputed, simply just neglected and now it has become a moral issue. Legal dictionaries do not specify what pertains to humanity as they were written for Admiralty law only; corporation law only deals with subjects/citizens of corporation so you will not find common law descriptions there. The fact of the matter is though; the undefiled/pure/virgin Black’s brain measures an average of 1.2kg. This means that pure Blacks are not Homo sapient but rather Homo erect. It also means that they are not included in the Bill of Rights of South Africa.

  3. Citizen: (etymology: a native or naturalized member of a state or nation who owes allegiance to its government and is entitled to its protection). The word originally meant city dweller but was applied for the first time in 1941. It was adopted by Admiralty Law to describe the inhabitants loyal to that system of governance. This is in contrast to Natural inhabitants who have the right to be free just as God made them to be. The “right” to be a citizen (Rule 20) of a corporation is a choice; it cannot be forced upon ignorant inhabitants without their consent.

7.

Courts in South Africa use the oath as a mechanism for revoking the whole truth. It is taken in the name of God. All legal practitioners i.e. judges, attorneys, lawyers, sheriffs etc are sworn in to uphold and maintain a moral loyalty to the legal system. If a legal system does not represent God’s laws at all as in the case of Maritime Law or abide by the Laws of God then the oath has no validity and its use is blasphemous. This offense at common law is defined to be a willful false oath know as Perjury. My common law wife and I are currently being persecuted by this system for Her being an “illegal (meaning: forbidden by official rules) Immigrant (meaning: an organism found in a new habitat)”, a rule of maritime law only. She is being sent for psyciatric evaluation at the end of January for stating that She follows God’s laws to the utmost and God is the only Judge. The mere mention of the word God in court revoked laughter from both the state prosecutor and the “judge”. God appoints Judges, not corporations (Judges 2:18). In common law there are no judges as those who follow God’s law judge themselves all the time. Further proof of this disrespect was also displayed by the sheriff of the Ubombo court who signed an affidavit stating that I received a summons to appear in court (Case# 10121/2011). I was liquidated as result and faced high legal fees to clear my name. The case of perjury against the sheriff with the Sheriffs Board (K11/1.UBOMBO/01/NS) was never resolved. Perjury is a criminal offense which makes the legal system criminal.

8.

The Constitution of South Africa binds all law including God’s. It is the highest authority and is accepted by all Juristic inhabitants and citizens as their rules of conduct. According the Constitution, we the people, have freedom of belief, association, expression and to defend Ourselves. It is a constitutional right to defend oneself, one’s spouse and fellow man. On 19/8/2016 on My wife’s first hearing, I presented Myself as Her representative; My fluencey in English and My comprehension of Our Constitutional rights is superior to Hers. I was immediately shunned and told to sit down as I am in contempt of court and not a registered legal practitioner. She did not know how to defend Herself and spoke the truth according to God’s law as that is all She knows. We speak as one, as according to God, We became one flesh on Our engagement on 31/3/2014 (Mark 10: 8-9, Gen 2: 24). She questioned the lawfulness of Her arrest as We are common law people (Rule 35. 2. b.) but was not allowed to state Her case. She was sent to a putrid holding cell (Rule 35. 2. c.) in Emanguzi where She has been ever since. I have supplied cleaning materials to make the place a bit more livable while She’s awaiting an appointment at Fort Napier on 24/01/2017. Not fair detention as She cannot leave SA without Her passport and her “offense” is minor (Rule 35. 3. e.), contrary to some of the 700 offenses Jacob Zuma is accused of. The Slovac Embassy wanted to remove her from South Africa but was denied. The Law applies to everyone equally.

9.

The bill of rights 39. (2.) states: When interpreting any legislation, and when developing the common law or customary law, every court, tribunal or forum must promote the spirit, purport and objects of the Bill of Rights. This is not the case.

10.

Rule 24. of the Constitution is there to protect what we have. The issue of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) is one of great concern to the world; many countries have banned them. In South Africa however there is nothing or very little else planted because Monsanto seed has the market. Big corporation has control of this; they are part of the same corporation structure as your governing body. Through your loyalty to the United Nations you have allowed South Africa to become a model country in this regard. The problem We face as Free Beings on the land is that We are not able to plant genetically normal plants for fear of cross pollination. If God did not make it, We cannot eat it; it is not natural. That makes the environment harmful to Our well being. Also harmful to the environment in that large quantities of glyphosate, a weed killer, is poisoning water resources and farming land. A second concern is that GMO affects honey bees and their honey. Without bees there will be no farming and GMO’s have built-in pesticide which affects bees as well. America is already experiencing this problem. These plants are excessively bad for the environment which the Constitution aims to protect for the future. We live in a rural area and We see the effects this “food” has on the inhabitants of the neighborhood.

11.

Jacob Zuma claims to believe in God. If so, then he will be aware of a pending disaster of which The Bible speaks and the coming of The Prince of Peace. It has been in the news of late; various countries leaders around the world have told their inhabitants to prepare for a disaster of some sort at any given time. That they should be able to survive for a period of ten days at least. What disaster are they expecting? Perhaps it is the fact that Earth is about to cross the Equatorial plane of the Sun again. This is part of a 12960 year cycle which happens without fail and what The Bible speaks of. Jacob Zuma has said nothing, so I take it that he is unaware. If God promised a disaster, there will be a disaster. It is time to explain to the inhabitants of South Africa what is going to happen. He is also aware of My presence yet he does not challenge or announce Me to the World. He is withholding information, and according to Rule 37 of the Constitution he is not allowed. If God promised his Son, He will be there. That is withholding vital information relevant to all of humanity, not just South Africans. Everyone has the right of access to any information the Government has (Rule 32. 1. a).

12.

Based on Rule 7. 2. of The Constitution, the corporate Governing body presently in power is illegal and has to be replaced in respect of the rights of the inhabitants according to the Bill of Rights for two reasons:

  1. It does not bear the interests of the inhabitants of South Africa in mind. They have been hijacked and lied to through the use of maritime law and illegal corporations. The law of the people which is common Law/tribal Law is the only law that applies to Juristic inhabitants who by their God given freedom are allowed to roam this planet at will, free as God made Us.

  2. As the Bill of Rights clearly only caters for Humans, it means that Blacks have no right to be in government (Proverbs 19: 10). The Bible states in Proverbs 1: “a man of understanding shall attain to wise council”; it is obvious that Jacob Zuma does not have that understanding. It is proven that Black Africans have an average intelligence quotient (IQ) of 70. The minimal IQ required by the Homo genus to independently run a civilization is 90. Africa had no cities, history records, dictionaries or even an alphabet on record in 1652 when Jan van Riebeeck landed in the Cape, contrary to Europe; proving that the statement is correct and accurate. It is also proven that Blacks have impaired cognitive ability. This means that it is impossible for the Homo erect to fully grasp or gain complete understanding of life. This is the reason for all the inequity taking place here right now and why South Africa has 0% industrial growth. God designed humanity to have a very specific hierarchy; it is time to make peace with that and restore God’s place amongst the Inhabitants.

13.

To date We have been violated by the Police and the Court on a minimum of 12 rules of the Constitution of South Africa. That being as follows:

1. Rule 7. (1.) (2.)

2. Rule 8.

3. Rule 9.

4. Rule 10.

5. Rule 12. 1. (d.) (e.)

6. Rule 14. (d.)

7. Rule 15. (1)

8. Rule 18.

9. Rule 24. (a.) (b.)

10. Rule 33. (1)

11. Rule 35. 2. (b.) (c.)

12. Rule 38. (a.) (b.)

14.

Jacob Zuma said; “the ANC will rule until Jesus comes”. Well Jacob, God has heard your plea. There is one mistake however. The name “Jesus” was created by the Roman Catholic Church, My opposition (Satan etymology: “In biblical sources the Hebrew term the satan describes an adversarial role”) as you may have noticed. The fact that courts use the phrase; “So help me God” is undeniable proof that there is no separation of Bible and state”!

I am known as Yahshuah Ha Mashiach; I am the Son of God Almighty and the King of the Tribe of Judah, the family root of Seth. To explain Myself to the world, My partner and witness, Ruach ha Kodesh, and I have published a Book. It is the book described in Revelation 10. It is the book of ABSOLUTE TRUTH. The book is published under the name Where to from Here: Cognition and was released in October 2014. It serves to validate Our Identity. A free copy may be downloaded at http://wheretofromhere.org under E-book. The information it bears comes directly from My Father. It is therefore imperative that you step down and for the corporate governmental body to be dissolved immediately. All ties with the United Nations, BRICKS and the Roman Catholic Church have to be broken. South Africa was founded and built on Biblical principals; one cannot be loyal to two kings at the same time.

(Signed)_________________________

DEPONENT

I certify that the deponent has acknowledged that He understands the contents of this affidavit which was sworn to before me at Mbazwana on this the 9th day of November 2016. That the same are true and correct to the best of His knowledge. That He has no objection to taking this oath which He also considers binding on His conscience and uttering the words “So help me God”

(Signed)_________________________

COMMISSIONER OF OATHS

Full names:________________________________

Capacity:________________________________

Address:________________________________